The Litecoin (LTC) price prediction is turning optimistic again as ETF buzz intensifies. LTC is trading above key support near $90, with a possible breakout toward $120 if regulatory clarity arrives soon. Meanwhile, Ethena (ENA) has climbed to around $0.48 but faces mixed momentum. Its market rally shows short-term strength while long-term signals remain uncertain. […]The Litecoin (LTC) price prediction is turning optimistic again as ETF buzz intensifies. LTC is trading above key support near $90, with a possible breakout toward $120 if regulatory clarity arrives soon. Meanwhile, Ethena (ENA) has climbed to around $0.48 but faces mixed momentum. Its market rally shows short-term strength while long-term signals remain uncertain. […]

Litecoin’s ETF Hopes Rise, Ethena Stalls, While BlockDAG’s 3.5M X1 Miners & $430M+ Presale Set New Crypto Standards

2025/10/30 01:00
BlockDAG

The Litecoin (LTC) price prediction is turning optimistic again as ETF buzz intensifies. LTC is trading above key support near $90, with a possible breakout toward $120 if regulatory clarity arrives soon. Meanwhile, Ethena (ENA) has climbed to around $0.48 but faces mixed momentum. Its market rally shows short-term strength while long-term signals remain uncertain.

In contrast, BlockDAG is rewriting crypto expectations. With its X1 mining app now exceeding 3.5 million users, the project has achieved adoption levels most networks reach years post-launch. Priced at $0.0015 in Batch 31 with $430 million raised, BlockDAG blends accessibility and innovation through its EVM compatibility, DAG-based architecture, and $0.05 launch price, redefining what early success looks like.

Litecoin Targets $120 as ETF Buzz Heats Up

Litecoin (LTC) is drawing investor attention again, driven by growing chances of a regulated exchange-traded fund (ETF) and a rebound in technical momentum. After dropping into the mid-$80 range, the price has held above key support levels and is now viewed as a candidate for a push toward the $120 target.

With ETF filings gaining traction and institutional interest showing, the market’s eagerness for the next best crypto play is rising. If LTC clears resistance around $100–$120 and ETF approval arrives, it could serve as a meaningful entry point. That said, regulatory delays and broader macro risks remain. Investing now may offer an opportunity, but only if support holds and momentum builds.

Ethena Trades Near $0.48: Is Sideways Its Most Likely Move?

Ethena (ENA) recently climbed above $0.48 but shows mixed signs of strength. The token trades above the 20-day moving average at $0.4716 and the 200-day average at $0.464, yet it remains below its 50-day average at $0.5908, highlighting short-term bullishness against lingering medium-term selling pressure.

Current momentum suggests Ethena may enter a sideways phase unless it breaks above $0.59 or falls below $0.39. Because key trend and momentum indicators conflict, the asset is in a technical stalemate. For buyers considering new positions, Ethena offers a defined entry with clear support, but only if the platform’s fundamentals improve and trend confirmation emerges.

3.5M+ Miners Before Launch: BlockDAG’s X1 Revolution Is Just Getting Started

BlockDAG’s momentum is rewriting market expectations. The X1 mining app has now surpassed 3.5 million active users, a figure higher than the total wallet counts of several established blockchains. This scale of early user adoption is rare, especially before the testnet launch, showing that BlockDAG’s ecosystem is driven by participation, not speculation.

Currently priced at $0.0015 in Batch 31, with $430 million raised and 27 billion BDAG coins sold, BlockDAG’s presale has become one of the most active events in crypto. Each new miner joining the X1 network reinforces growing community strength and deep market confidence ahead of the $0.05 launch price. At its core, BlockDAG’s hybrid DAG + Proof-of-Work architecture, EVM compatibility, and scalable infrastructure define its long-term potential. 

The X1 app bridges accessibility with innovation, allowing anyone to mine directly from a smartphone. With this level of traction before launch, BlockDAG is not just another project; it’s proof that mass adoption can start before a blockchain even goes live. With its Awakening Testnet, BWT Alpine Formula 1® partnership, and a rapidly expanding X1 ecosystem, BlockDAG continues to prove that scalability, community engagement, and real-world adoption can coexist before launch.

Bottom Line

While Litecoin (LTC) edges closer to the $120 zone and Ethena (ENA) balances above $0.48, both remain tied to market cycles and technical thresholds. Their outlooks depend on ETF progress and renewed liquidity inflows. Yet, these developments pale compared to what’s unfolding in BlockDAG’s ecosystem.

With the Awakening Testnet, BWT Alpine Formula 1® Team partnership, and a presale that’s already sold 27 billion coins, BlockDAG demonstrates unmatched traction. Its hybrid DAG + Proof-of-Work model delivers both scalability and sustainability, while X1’s massive user base signals real adoption ahead of launch. Priced at just $0.0015, heading toward a $0.05 listing, BDAG stands out as the most compelling opportunity among the top crypto coins right now.

Presale: https://purchase.blockdag.network

Website: https://blockdag.network

Telegram: https://t.me/blockDAGnetworkOfficial

Discord: https://discord.gg/Q7BxghMVyu

Clause de non-responsabilité : les articles republiés sur ce site proviennent de plateformes publiques et sont fournis à titre informatif uniquement. Ils ne reflètent pas nécessairement les opinions de MEXC. Tous les droits restent la propriété des auteurs d'origine. Si vous estimez qu'un contenu porte atteinte aux droits d'un tiers, veuillez contacter service@support.mexc.com pour demander sa suppression. MEXC ne garantit ni l'exactitude, ni l'exhaustivité, ni l'actualité des contenus, et décline toute responsabilité quant aux actions entreprises sur la base des informations fournies. Ces contenus ne constituent pas des conseils financiers, juridiques ou professionnels, et ne doivent pas être interprétés comme une recommandation ou une approbation de la part de MEXC.
Partager des idées

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi

Pavel's humanity, and Ton's challenges

Pavel's humanity, and Ton's challenges

I really like what Pavel mentioned about not using a mobile phone. Essentially, this is an "information fasting" approach to the challenges of information overload, contrasting with the "food fasting" that everyone loves using apps. One is metaphysical, the other is physical, but ultimately, both affect the mind and body, influencing hormones like cortisol. Now and in the future, attention is the scarcest resource. Being able to freely disconnect from electronic devices is a luxury, a freedom with its own barriers. Pavel is also an extreme craftsman. The advantage of being a craftsman is that you can lead a small team to create a killer app. However, the limitation is that Telegram, as the largest instant messaging software outside of China and the US, cannot become another Tencent platform. This same culture has also influenced its Web3 project, TON. By the way, let me talk about my close observation of TON over the past four years as the first Chinese institutional investor in the world. 1. The wrong technological path was taken. TON's stubborn insistence on using C++ seems like a kind of technological purist obsession. Historically, Russians have repeatedly taken the wrong turn on the "data technology tree": the Soviet Union failed to adapt to the transistor revolution, became obsessed with vacuum tube performance optimization, and missed the entire chip wave. They often overemphasize performance and control, but neglect the ecosystem and development experience. TON's SDK, toolchain, and documentation ecosystem lack standardization, making the development threshold too high; this is not a syntax problem, but a problem of lacking platform thinking. 2. Uneven ecological composition. Currently, it's basically only Russians and Chinese who are active, but resource allocation is clearly biased towards the Russian-speaking region. This is something everyone is already familiar with. 3. Oligopoly. Funding, traffic, and narrative resources within the ecosystem are concentrated on a few "top" companies/projects. Everyone knows they must curry favor with the "top" teams, but mid-tier projects are severely squeezed out. There is also a long-term power struggle between foundations and the oligopolistic "top" companies, resulting in constant internal friction. 4. Failure to accept oneself. Accepting and reconciling with oneself is crucial for any individual or organization. Only on this basis can you face yourself honestly and leverage your strengths while mitigating your weaknesses. However, TON seems obsessed with pitching to Musk, persuading American investors, and getting to the White House. The truth is, no matter how hard it tries, in the eyes of others, TON remains a public chain with a Russian background. In contrast, BNB didn't try to play the "American" role. Instead, it first became the most popular chain in the Eastern Time Zone, simultaneously creating a sense of FOMO (Fear of Missing Out) among Westerners, before smoothly expanding internationally—a much more effective approach. 5. The story of "adoption for 1 billion users" has been told for four years, and it's still just a story. Pavel keeps telling a grand story of "connecting Telegram's 1 billion users with the blockchain world," but this story has yet to truly materialize. The reason isn't that the vision is false, but rather structural constraints: In order to survive and ensure Pavel's personal safety (in recent years, Pavel has become increasingly obsessed with his physical safety, given several incidents, including the recent events in France), Telegram must maintain a "superficial" separation from TON to avoid crossing regulatory red lines; this separation prevents TON from ever truly integrating with Telegram's ecosystem. Even stablecoins like USDE have maintained a supply of only a few hundred million—indicating that the story is grand, but the reality is small. TON possesses the perfectionism of engineering geeks, yet lacks the warmth of ecological collaboration; it has a massive entry point, but is hampered by regulatory realities; it has its own advantages, but has not yet reconciled with itself. It has a narrative and ideals, but these need to be transformed into a sustainable balance of systems and incentives. I wish the TON ecosystem will continue to improve.
Partager
PANews2025/10/30 14:00