Malaysian Chinese, the shadow army of the crypto world

2025/09/02 18:00

Authors: Yanz, June, TechFlow

When people talk about the protagonists of the crypto world, they always think of Silicon Valley geeks, Wall Street capital, investment institutions in Singapore and Hong Kong, and mainland developers, but few people turn their attention to Malaysian Chinese.

They didn’t appear on the cover of Fortune like SBF, nor were they labeled as the “richest Chinese” like Changpeng Zhao.

They rarely accept spotlight interviews and are often even "invisible" on Twitter.

However, when you really dismantle the landscape of the encryption industry, you will be surprised to find that:

  • Coingecko, the world's largest encrypted data platform, was born in Kuala Lumpur;
  • Etherscan, an indispensable component of the Ethereum ecosystem, was built by Malaysian Chinese;
  • Virtuals Protocol, which is the hottest narrative in the bull market, "AI+Crypto", also comes from a Malaysian Chinese team.
  • Solana Ecosystem Liquidity Center Jupiter, from Malaysia.

These projects are not scraps that can be replaced at any time, but have become the infrastructure of the crypto industry and the spark of new narratives.

Without the Chinese in Malaysia, today's crypto industry would lose a pair of "eyes", a "map", and even a future "road of exploration".

Central China Real Estate

In 2014, Mt. Gox collapsed, plunging the crypto world into darkness. Amidst the market's turmoil, Bobby Ong and TM Lee founded Coingecko with $100 in seed capital.

 Source: Fintechnews

One studied economics, the other was a programmer. Their chance encounter led them to a shared vision: the market desperately needed a transparent, reliable data platform. Thus, Coingecko was born amidst a market crisis.

"We want to be a company that serves everyone in the world," they summed up their original aspirations years later. This direction has proven to be correct. With its Trust Score algorithm and coverage of marginal markets, Coingecko quickly became a daily must-have for investors. Ten years later, it now tracks over 17,000 tokens, and its API is widely used by platforms like Trezor and Metamask.

Around the same time, another young Malaysian, Matthew Tan, was also interested in Ethereum. He previously ran a blockchain search engine called Blockscan. When Ethereum smart contracts emerged, he keenly identified a key issue that had been largely overlooked: block explorers at the time could only handle simple peer-to-peer transactions and were completely unable to cope with the complexities of smart contracts.

So, he almost took a gamble and reshaped Blockscan into Etherscan.

“It’s no longer about transferring value from point A to point B. There’s so much more that needs to be surfaced by search engines.”

He decisively transformed and upgraded Blockscan, an early blockchain search engine that had been in operation for two years, into Etherscan, and redesigned the underlying architecture specifically to address the complexity of smart contracts.

Today, Etherscan has evolved from a simple tool into the de facto standard in the Ethereum ecosystem, indispensable to nearly every Ethereum user. With the advent of the multi-chain era, the successive launch of products like BscScan, PolygonScan, and ArbiScan has further solidified this Malaysian-Chinese company's dominance in the blockchain explorer space.

It’s 2021. As the heat of DeFi’s summer lingers, a young man named TN Lee sets his sights on a more complex problem: how to make yields more predictable and tradable?

With a background in computer science and a deep understanding of the logic of financial derivatives, he proposed a seemingly crazy concept at the time: tokenized returns. He separated future returns into principal tokens (PT) and return tokens (YT), allowing users to trade these two components independently.

The seemingly simple innovation actually took several years. In 2021, Pendle Protocol was born.

Also in 2021, young developer Siong set his sights on Solana. He saw the potential for high performance, but also the challenges of fragmented liquidity and excessive slippage. So, he and his team created Jupiter, a transaction aggregator that automatically finds the optimal path using an intelligent routing algorithm.

From humble beginnings, by 2024, both Pendle and Jupiter had achieved significant success in their respective ecosystems. Pendle became the leading DeFi protocol with over $10 billion in total value locked (TVL), while Jupiter became a liquidity hub within the Solana ecosystem, with daily trading volume regularly exceeding $1 billion and a total token market capitalization exceeding $10 billion.

The entrepreneurial story doesn't end there. In 2024, Weekee Tiew, formerly of Boston Consulting Group, set his sights on AI. He previously founded the gaming guild PathDAO, which was valued at $600 million. However, the company hit rock bottom during the bear market, leaving him struggling to find a way forward. In 2024, he pivoted and launched Virtuals Protocol, focusing on the creation and distribution of AI agents.

 Source: LinkedIn

Virtuals Protocol's token $VIRTUAL hit a new high of over $4.5 billion in market capitalization in January 2025, becoming one of the most representative projects in the field of AI and Crypto integration.

It was not until Weekee Tiew became a hit and appeared on many podcasts that people were surprised to find out that it was actually a Malaysian project.

Not only that, Pendle, Jupiter, Aevo, and Drift are also from Malaysia.

On Twitter, everyone seems to have reached a consensus that this cycle is a bull market for Malaysian entrepreneurship.

Bridge Builder

"I still have many Malaysian friends who don't talk much on social media."

Compared with well-known entrepreneurs, more Malaysian Chinese in the crypto industry are scattered in the industry like tendons and veins, stringing together flexible limbs, and their roles are like meridians, stringing together markets with different cultural backgrounds.

Malaysian Chinese are natural bridge builders.

Cova, a Malaysian Chinese, has been involved in the crypto industry for five years. As she communicated more with practitioners from all over the world, she truly realized the unique advantages of Malaysian Chinese in the industry.

"I think Malaysian Chinese are natural customer service professionals. Normally, a Malaysian Chinese person speaks at least three languages, not including dialects - Chinese, Malay, and English. Some even speak Japanese and Korean."

Since kindergarten, they have lived in an environment where Chinese, English and Malay are intertwined. In addition to their different backgrounds, they also speak Cantonese, Teochew, Hakka... This "multi-threaded" language ability allows them to thrive in the team - they can follow hot trends in Europe and the United States, take care of the Southeast Asian market, cooperate with international teams, and connect with customers from all over the world.

This linguistic talent is particularly valuable in the crypto world. Virtuals Protocol founder Weekee Tiew can demonstrate to European and American listeners in his English podcast how Virtuals truly integrates AI and crypto, and he can also directly explain Virtuals' grand vision to Chinese audiences at offline events. This multilingual ability allows him to simultaneously serve developer communities from diverse cultural backgrounds.

At the intersection of cultures, Cova also believes that Malaysian Chinese and Singaporeans will integrate faster.

"For example, Malaysian Chinese and Singaporeans are quick to assimilate and understand American projects, meme culture, and cultures from lesser-known countries."

The cultural DNA of Malaysian Chinese is like a master key, opening the door to multiple international markets.

However, this unique multilingual advantage also brings an unexpected side effect: the blurring of identity.

Whenever Malaysian Chinese start their own Twitter accounts or create crypto projects, they face a crucial decision: should they use English or Chinese as the primary medium of communication? This choice often determines the audience and market scope they can reach.

A typical example is that if you didn’t specify, you might be hard to guess that the well-known Chinese KOL @Wolfy_XBT is actually Malaysian Chinese. Similarly, well-known English KOLs @ahboyash and @sandraaleow are also from Malaysia.

More importantly, in order to gain wider recognition and acceptance in the global market, many Malaysian Chinese entrepreneurs will intentionally or unintentionally downplay their regional identity. They hope that their products will be seen as "international" solutions rather than projects from a specific country.

This strategy is often smart business-wise, but it also leads to an unfortunate consequence: most users have no idea that these world-changing products actually come from Malaysia.

When you use Etherscan to query Ethereum transactions, you may not think that this is the work of a Malaysian Chinese team; when you trade tokens on Jupiter, when you study Pendle's profit strategy, you may be more likely to think that this is the masterpiece of an elite European and American team.

Their "invisible" identity precisely illustrates the adaptability of Malaysian Chinese in the context of globalization, but it also reflects their complex situation in identity recognition and market positioning.

Behind this blurred identity lies a deeper problem: brain drain.

Many Malaysian Chinese have chosen to leave their homeland to pursue careers. This fertile land continues to cultivate batches of talent, but due to various practical factors, whether it is the policy environment, market size, or the degree of internationalization, these talents are often forced to flow to overseas markets.

They shine brightly on the global stage, yet few know their true origins. This "invisible success" illustrates the adaptability of Malaysian Chinese in the context of globalization, but also the price this group has paid for globalization.

They are the best bridge builders, but also the builders whose identities are most easily forgotten.

Changemaker

Seriousness, practicality, and contentment are the common traits of most Malaysian Chinese. They rarely publicize their achievements on social media, preferring to let their solid work speak for itself.

This low-key personality trait is deeply connected to their historical experiences.

During the "Southeast Asia" migration of the late Qing Dynasty, Chinese people migrated from China's southeastern coastal areas to the Malay Peninsula. Faced with a completely unfamiliar environment and culture, they relied on diligence and ingenuity to find a place to survive within the British colonial economy. However, even though they achieved commercial success through their efforts, the colonial government's "divide and rule" policy consistently excluded Chinese people from political power.

After Malaysia's independence in 1957, the political ideology of "Malay supremacy" and the subsequent implementation of the New Economic Policy further restricted opportunities for Chinese in education, employment, and business through a quota system. University admissions were limited, government jobs were restricted, and even starting a business faced various policy barriers.

This long-term institutional pressure has shaped the unique survival philosophy of the Chinese in Malaysia: since they cannot change the broader environment, they focus on doing well in the things they can control. They have learned to survive in the cracks, to prove their worth through their own strength, and to remain resilient in the face of adversity.

“Malaysian Chinese have always been oppressed by policies, so most of them just keep their heads down and work hard, just to make money.”

This resilience, fostered by these past experiences, has become a distinct advantage in the challenging crypto industry. When the market plummets, they don't panic; when projects encounter difficulties, they find solutions rather than complain; and when opportunities arise, they quietly seize them rather than hype them up.

However, the process of focusing on work, making profits from pursuing dreams, proving strength through successful projects, and changing the outside world's inherent impression of the Malaysian Chinese community is not smooth sailing.

Early on, Malaysian crypto projects had a less than favorable reputation, with many suspected of market manipulation and pyramid schemes. Cova noted that Malaysian Chinese were easily perceived by partners as "sponsors" of the project, a bias that created an additional cost of trust when establishing a business.

The formation of this negative impression has historical roots.

Malaysia's lack of early fintech regulation created numerous gray areas, allowing some criminals to exploit these gaps to engage in illegal fundraising and fraud. Many projects touted as "blockchain innovation" profited from repeated losses, harming investors and casting a shadow over Malaysia's tech startup ecosystem.

Worse still, these negative stories often spread faster and more widely than positive ones. When people hear the term "Malaysian project," their first reaction might not be technological innovation but rather "beware of being ripped off." This stereotype has become an invisible obstacle that all Chinese Malaysian entrepreneurs must face.

But times are changing. The global success of projects like CoinGecko, Etherscan, Pendle, Jupiter, and Virtuals Protocol is putting high-quality Malaysian projects in the spotlight on the international stage, gradually improving global users' perception of Malaysian tech projects.

"I think these down-to-earth builders have also proved in the past two or three bull markets that they are not the stereotypical project parties who play the pyramid game, but that they are big international projects at the first try." said a Malaysian Chinese practitioner.

Across cycles, this shadow army has been doing its thing in the industry, building businesses, building bridges, and realizing dreams... until they are seen, until they are recognized, or "just make money."

Clause de non-responsabilité : les articles republiés sur ce site proviennent de plateformes publiques et sont fournis à titre informatif uniquement. Ils ne reflètent pas nécessairement les opinions de MEXC. Tous les droits restent la propriété des auteurs d'origine. Si vous estimez qu'un contenu porte atteinte aux droits d'un tiers, veuillez contacter service@support.mexc.com pour demander sa suppression. MEXC ne garantit ni l'exactitude, ni l'exhaustivité, ni l'actualité des contenus, et décline toute responsabilité quant aux actions entreprises sur la base des informations fournies. Ces contenus ne constituent pas des conseils financiers, juridiques ou professionnels, et ne doivent pas être interprétés comme une recommandation ou une approbation de la part de MEXC.
Partager des idées

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi

Ethereum Closes Holesky Doors: Will Hoodi Deliver?

Ethereum Closes Holesky Doors: Will Hoodi Deliver?

The Ethereum Holesky shutdown has officially been confirmed, marking the closure of the network’s largest testnet. The Ethereum Foundation announced that Holesky will sunset following the Fusaka upgrade, paving the way for developers to migrate to the newer Hoodi testnet.  Timeline of Closure and Holesky’s Role in Ethereum Testing According to the foundation, the Ethereum Holesky shutdown will occur two weeks after the Fusaka upgrade finalizes on Holesky. Although an exact date has not yet been determined, the closure is expected to happen in the second half of September, well ahead of Fusaka’s mainnet launch scheduled for November. After this point, Holesky will no longer receive support from infrastructure, client, or testing teams. Launched in September 2023, Holesky was built to serve as Ethereum’s largest validator and staking testnet. It played a central role in allowing thousands of validators to test major upgrades, including the Dencun and Pectra forks. By providing a realistic environment for validator lifecycle testing, Holesky ensured that critical features were trialed before being deployed on the mainnet. The Ethereum Holesky shutdown now concludes this two-year experiment. Source: X Technical Challenges That Led to Closure While Holesky delivered important contributions, its limitations became clear in early 2025. The network suffered extensive inactivity leaks that created months-long validator exit queues. These delays made it difficult to test validator operations effectively, frustrating developers who needed quick feedback.  Also read: Ethereum’s Holesky Testnet Restores Finality, Pectra Testing Resumes Although the network recovered, confidence had eroded. The Ethereum Holesky shutdown was therefore a practical solution to prevent further inefficiencies and redirect resources to more reliable testnets. Hoodi Testnet as the New Successor To address Holesky’s shortcomings, the Ethereum Foundation launched the Hoodi testnet in March 2025. Designed as a clean-slate environment, Hoodi eliminates prolonged validator queues and supports fast development cycles.  It already runs the Pectra update and will also support the upcoming Fusaka fork. The Ethereum Holesky shutdown effectively transfers staking and validator testing responsibilities to Hoodi, which is now positioned as the primary network for these operations. Role of Sepolia and Ephemery in the Ecosystem The transition does not leave developers without options. Sepolia continues to serve as the main testnet for decentralized applications and smart contract testing. Meanwhile, Ephemery provides rapid-reset validator cycles every 28 days, offering flexibility for short-term experiments.  Importance of the Fusaka Upgrade Central to Ethereum’s upcoming roadmap is the Fusaka upgrade, scheduled for November 2025. Fusaka introduces 11 Ethereum Improvement Proposals designed to enhance rollup efficiency, distribute data workloads more evenly, and reduce transaction costs.  By simplifying node operations, Fusaka aims to make the network more decentralized and scalable. The Ethereum Holesky shutdown ensures that developers’ efforts are concentrated on testnets capable of fully supporting Fusaka’s requirements. Looking further ahead, the Ethereum community is preparing for the Glamsterdam upgrade, expected in 2026. Proposed under EIP-7782, Glamsterdam seeks to halve block times to six seconds and separate block validation from execution, thereby enabling more efficient zero-knowledge proof generation.  Market Implications and Community Response The Ethereum Holesky shutdown has been met with understanding from both the community and the market. While some developers expressed nostalgia for Holesky’s role, most acknowledge that Hoodi offers a stronger, faster, and more reliable testing environment.  The broader market has reacted positively to Ethereum’s steady pace of upgrades. ETH prices have risen more than 200% since April as institutions increase their exposure to the asset. Conclusion The Ethereum Holesky shutdown represents a significant turning point for Ethereum’s testing ecosystem. Holesky served its purpose by enabling large-scale validator testing and major upgrade trials, but its technical flaws made long-term use unsustainable.  By shifting focus to Hoodi, alongside Sepolia and Ephemery, Ethereum is ensuring that its testnet landscape is both reliable and efficient. This transition highlights the foundation’s long-standing commitment to building a network that balances scalability, decentralization, and user experience. Also read: Vitalik Just Proposed a Radical Shift for Ethereum’s Future Summary The Ethereum Holesky shutdown ends the network’s largest validator testnet. It closes after two years of service due to technical challenges. Developers will now migrate to Hoodi, a faster and more reliable successor. Hoodi is built to support upcoming upgrades like Fusaka.  Sepolia and Ephemery will remain active for dapp and short-cycle testing. The move streamlines Ethereum’s testnet ecosystem. It reinforces the network’s focus on scalability, decentralization, and user experience. It also prepares Ethereum for future upgrades. Appendix: Glossary of Key Terms Ethereum Holesky Shutdown – Planned closure of Ethereum’s largest validator testnet. Hoodi Testnet – A new environment replacing Holesky for validator testing. Fusaka Upgrade – Ethereum’s upcoming fork aimed at scaling rollups. Sepolia Testnet – Primary testing ground for dapps and smart contracts. Ephemery Testnet – Short-cycle testnet with 28-day validator resets. Pectra Update – A recent protocol upgrade trialed on testnets. Dencun Upgrade – A major past Ethereum upgrade supported by Holesky. FAQs for Ethereum Holesky shutdown 1-Why is the Ethereum Holesky shutdown happening? The shutdown addresses persistent technical issues, including validator inactivity leaks and impractical exit queues, which made Holesky less efficient for testing. 2- What replaces Holesky after the shutdown? Hoodi testnet now serves as the main environment for validator and staking provider testing, while Sepolia remains the primary dapp testnet. 3- When will the Ethereum Holesky shutdown occur? It will take place two weeks after the Fusaka upgrade finalizes on Holesky, expected in September 2025. 4- Will the Ethereum Holesky shutdown affect dapp developers? No. Developers testing smart contracts should continue using Sepolia as recommended by the Ethereum Foundation. Read More: Ethereum Closes Holesky Doors: Will Hoodi Deliver?">Ethereum Closes Holesky Doors: Will Hoodi Deliver?
Partager
Coinstats2025/09/03 01:00
Partager