DeFi lending protocol Suilend has taken precautionary measures in response to a major loss reported by Stream Finance, which is having ripple effects in the Sui ecosystem.  One of the worst hit was Elixir, a protocol that appears to have borrowed against assets linked to Stream Finance’s xUSD, a dollar-pegged stablecoin-like asset.  Suilend takes action […]DeFi lending protocol Suilend has taken precautionary measures in response to a major loss reported by Stream Finance, which is having ripple effects in the Sui ecosystem.  One of the worst hit was Elixir, a protocol that appears to have borrowed against assets linked to Stream Finance’s xUSD, a dollar-pegged stablecoin-like asset.  Suilend takes action […]

Suilend pauses deposits and withdrawals specifically in its Elixir Isolated Market in response to a major loss reported by Stream Finance

2025/11/05 02:50

DeFi lending protocol Suilend has taken precautionary measures in response to a major loss reported by Stream Finance, which is having ripple effects in the Sui ecosystem. 

One of the worst hit was Elixir, a protocol that appears to have borrowed against assets linked to Stream Finance’s xUSD, a dollar-pegged stablecoin-like asset. 

Suilend takes action against Elixir

A few hours after Stream Finance announced that it had taken a huge loss, Suilend posted an update on X, assuring users that the team was keeping a close eye on the developing issue affecting Elixir’s deUSD.

The post also stated that deposits and withdrawals in the Elixir Isolated Market have been paused, and communications have been attempted as Suilend demands loan repayment. 

In the meantime, the team says that “all other Suilend markets are unaffected and remain safe.” The post directly quoted the post from Stream Finance that contained information about the huge loss it had taken.

According to the post, the loss occurred through an external fund manager overseeing Stream funds, and the total amount lost was approximately $93 million in Stream fund assets, as Cryptopolitan reported earlier today. 

Stream Finance’s community suspects that the fund manager may have used customer deposits for risky investments, as the protocol has not shared any evidence of a hack or external malicious attacks. 

This suggests that the problem may have been internal, and Stream has responded by engaging the services of Keith Miller and Joseph Cutler of the law firm Perkins Coie LLP to look into the incident thoroughly and initiate a withdrawal of all liquid assets, a process that is expected to be completed in the near term.

“To keep our stakeholders informed, we will provide periodic updates as additional information becomes available,” the post read. “Until we are able to fully assess the scope and causes of the loss, all withdrawals and deposits will be temporarily suspended. Any pending deposits will not be processed at this time.”

Stream Finance has called its decision to retain Perkins Coie LLP proof of the platform’s unwavering commitment to transparency and robust corporate governance. Elixir has also responded to the Stream debacle with a post claiming, “Elixir has full redemption rights at $1 with Stream for its lending position.”

“We are the only creditor with these 1-1 rights,” the team has boasted, while declaring that deUSD remains fully backed as Elixir begins the process of unwinding its lending position to Stream, alongside the team.

The DeFi industry has faced significant losses this year. 

Reports claim that the loss Stream Finance endured came less than 24 hours after another yield-focused DeFi protocol, known as Balancer, faced exploits across multiple chains that led to a loss of over $100 million. 

The co-founder and CEO of Trading Strategy, Mikko Ohtamaa, has suggested that the fault lies with a defective smart contract, as concurrent transactions had been altering internal balance accounting.

The exploit is being floated as one of the biggest DeFi hacks this year and comes days after a smaller theft of $5.5 million from the Garden Finance bridge. Small exploits like that don’t often make headlines, but the losses add up, painting a grim picture of what has been going on in the DeFi sector this year.

According to a Peckshield report, 20 major DeFi platforms were exploited in September alone, which led to a collective loss of over $127 million, a 22% decline from August’s loss of $163 million. Meanwhile, total DeFi-related losses in 2025 have now crossed $3 billion, with the Bunni DEX being one of the biggest losers. 

Unlike the other platforms that are still able to operate and take steps to fix the damage, the Bunni DEX completely shut down after it reportedly lost over $8 million to hackers and lost the ability to cover new security audit costs.

The smartest crypto minds already read our newsletter. Want in? Join them.

Clause de non-responsabilité : les articles republiés sur ce site proviennent de plateformes publiques et sont fournis à titre informatif uniquement. Ils ne reflètent pas nécessairement les opinions de MEXC. Tous les droits restent la propriété des auteurs d'origine. Si vous estimez qu'un contenu porte atteinte aux droits d'un tiers, veuillez contacter service@support.mexc.com pour demander sa suppression. MEXC ne garantit ni l'exactitude, ni l'exhaustivité, ni l'actualité des contenus, et décline toute responsabilité quant aux actions entreprises sur la base des informations fournies. Ces contenus ne constituent pas des conseils financiers, juridiques ou professionnels, et ne doivent pas être interprétés comme une recommandation ou une approbation de la part de MEXC.
Partager des idées

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi

Cleaning Up Crypto ATMs Isn’t Anti-Crypto

Cleaning Up Crypto ATMs Isn’t Anti-Crypto

The post Cleaning Up Crypto ATMs Isn’t Anti-Crypto appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. When Iowa Attorney General Brenna Bird filed lawsuits against CoinFlip and Bitcoin Depot earlier this year, a few astroturfed voices cried that this consumer protection push was “anti-crypto.” They’re wrong. Crypto ATMs – physical kiosks that let users buy crypto – have become a vehicle for fraud, and they need reform. Law enforcement, regulators, and consumer advocates have all raised concerns about these machines for years. DC AG Brian Schwalb sued Athena Bitcoin in September. Pennsylvania AG Dave Sunday has warned that BATMs are a “magnet for scammers.” Arizona AG Kris Mayes even posted “STOP” signs at some crypto ATM locations.  Congressional scrutiny is also increasing. Senator Cynthia Lummis (R-WY), a longtime Bitcoin advocate, has called for stronger safeguards. Earlier this year, Senate Judiciary Ranking Member Dick Durbin highlighted abuses, and a few weeks ago, Senator Elizabeth Warren called out crypto ATM operators, signaling that regulatory pressure will only intensify. The Evidence Nationwide, the FBI estimates that in the first half of 2025 , Americans lost $240 million to crypto ATM fraud. The Iowa AG’s office contacted the top 50 Bitcoin Depot users in Iowa between 2021 and 2024, representing more than $2.4 million in transactions. Of the 34 who responded, every single one confirmed they had been scammed. Likewise, an investigation by the DC Attorney General uncovered that 93% (!) of Athena ATM deposits in the District of Columbia during a five-month period were scam transactions.  The stories follow a predictable pattern: romance scams, bogus police calls, phony tech support. Scammers play on panic, steering victims to crypto ATMs where they’re told to pour in cash and send crypto to wallets run by criminals. Store clerks at the convenience stores and smoke shops where the kiosks are hosted have tried to intervene, but to do so effectively, they need training…
Partager
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/11/05 08:29