PANews reported on November 3 that the Ethereum Foundation announced the launch of the Ecosystem Support ESP Funding Program. This program will continue to fund projects open to everyone, but will now be conducted through two channels: a wish list and a call for proposals. These channels aim to address the most pressing needs in the ecosystem identified by various teams within the Ethereum Foundation. The former will set high-level goals to guide key areas of work, focusing on broader themes rather than specific projects; the latter will focus on clear deliverables or measurable results, including predefined scope, requirements, and expected outcomes.PANews reported on November 3 that the Ethereum Foundation announced the launch of the Ecosystem Support ESP Funding Program. This program will continue to fund projects open to everyone, but will now be conducted through two channels: a wish list and a call for proposals. These channels aim to address the most pressing needs in the ecosystem identified by various teams within the Ethereum Foundation. The former will set high-level goals to guide key areas of work, focusing on broader themes rather than specific projects; the latter will focus on clear deliverables or measurable results, including predefined scope, requirements, and expected outcomes.

The Ethereum Foundation launches a new ESP funding program, offering two pathways: a wish list and a proposal solicitation.

2025/11/03 22:30

PANews reported on November 3 that the Ethereum Foundation announced the launch of the Ecosystem Support ESP Funding Program. This program will continue to fund projects open to everyone, but will now be conducted through two channels: a wish list and a call for proposals. These channels aim to address the most pressing needs in the ecosystem identified by various teams within the Ethereum Foundation. The former will set high-level goals to guide key areas of work, focusing on broader themes rather than specific projects; the latter will focus on clear deliverables or measurable results, including predefined scope, requirements, and expected outcomes.

Clause de non-responsabilité : les articles republiés sur ce site proviennent de plateformes publiques et sont fournis à titre informatif uniquement. Ils ne reflètent pas nécessairement les opinions de MEXC. Tous les droits restent la propriété des auteurs d'origine. Si vous estimez qu'un contenu porte atteinte aux droits d'un tiers, veuillez contacter service@support.mexc.com pour demander sa suppression. MEXC ne garantit ni l'exactitude, ni l'exhaustivité, ni l'actualité des contenus, et décline toute responsabilité quant aux actions entreprises sur la base des informations fournies. Ces contenus ne constituent pas des conseils financiers, juridiques ou professionnels, et ne doivent pas être interprétés comme une recommandation ou une approbation de la part de MEXC.
Partager des idées

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi

lessons from Malta’s Papaya case

lessons from Malta’s Papaya case

The post lessons from Malta’s Papaya case appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. SPONSORED POST* Standfirst: In August 2025, Malta became the unlikely stage for a clash between a fintech firm and one of the island’s most powerful newspapers. Papaya Ltd’s response – measured, legalistic, and paired with concrete operational moves, now stands as a case study in how financial institutions can build resilience under pressure. Drawing on the joint expertise of Lincoln’s Inn barrister (UK)  Hamna Zain and former Deutsche Bank professional Davor Zilic (croatian fintech specialist), this article examines what happened, and what it tells us about the uneasy balance between law, journalism and finance. In early August 2025, Papaya Ltd – a licensed Maltese electronic money institution (EMI), found itself in the eye of a media storm. The Times of Malta, the country’s largest daily, sent the company a list of probing questions which, Papaya argued, would have forced it to reveal confidential information from a 2021 compliance audit. The firm turned to the courts, asking for a temporary injunction to prevent publication. A judge granted a temporary protective measure pending a full hearing on its request for an injunction, that blocked the newspaper from publishing an as-yet-unwritten article about the company. The request for a substantive injunction was ultimately refused on 12 August. This legal action, triggered after one of the newspaper’s journalists sent questions to Papaya, prompted heated debate about press freedom, censorship, and the responsibilities of both media and financial firms. The headlines were immediate and emotive. “Times of Malta hit by court ‘gagging order’ from e-money firm”. “We’ve been gagged. This is why it matters.” For days, the injunction was portrayed as an assault on press freedom. The newspaper itself argued that “preventing a journalist from publishing a story is recognised in all democratic countries as illegal and a violation of the journalist’s fundamental right to…
Partager
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/20 23:05