Moore’s Law and Dennard Scaling drove explosive growth in computing power. But in the early 2000s, things hit a wall when transistors became so tiny. Multi-Core Processors let chip work on multiple tasks at once. This led to the rise of GPUs, which are built to handle thousands of tasks in parallel.Moore’s Law and Dennard Scaling drove explosive growth in computing power. But in the early 2000s, things hit a wall when transistors became so tiny. Multi-Core Processors let chip work on multiple tasks at once. This led to the rise of GPUs, which are built to handle thousands of tasks in parallel.

Why Machine Learning Loves GPUs: Moore’s Law, Dennard Scaling, and the Rise of CUDA & HIP

2025/11/06 14:11

\

The Hidden Connection Behind Faster Computers: Moore’s Law & Dennard Scaling

If you’ve ever wondered why computers keep getting faster every few years, there’s a fascinating story behind it. Back in 1965, Gordon Moore, one of Intel’s founders, noticed a pattern: the number of transistors that could fit on a chip doubled roughly every two years. This observation became known as *Moore’s Law*, and for decades it drove explosive growth in computing power. Imagine going from a chip with 1,000 transistors one year to one with 2,000 just two years later—an incredible rate of progress that felt unstoppable.

\ But Moore’s Law wasn’t working alone. Another principle, called Dennard Scaling, explained that as transistors got smaller, they could also get faster and more power-efficient. In other words, chips could pack in more transistors without using more energy. For a long time, this perfect combination kept computers improving at an impressive pace—faster, cheaper, and more efficient with every generation.

Then, around the early 2000s, things hit a wall. Transistors became so tiny—around 90 nanometers—that they started leaking current and overheating. Dennard Scaling stopped working, meaning that just shrinking chips no longer gave the same performance boost. That’s when the industry had to change direction.

From Faster Chips to Smarter Designs – Enter Multi-Core Processors

Instead of pushing clock speeds higher (which caused chips to get too hot), engineers began splitting processors into multiple cores. Chips like the AMD Athlon 64 X2 and Intel Pentium D were among the first to put two or more cores on a single die. Each core could handle its own task, letting the chip work on multiple things at once. This idea—doing more work in parallel instead of one task faster—became the foundation of modern CPU design.

Of course, that shift wasn’t easy. Software and hardware suddenly had to deal with new challenges: managing multiple threads, keeping workloads balanced, and avoiding data bottlenecks between cores and memory. Architects also had to carefully handle power usage and heat. It wasn’t just about raw speed anymore—it became about efficiency and smart coordination.

Latency vs. Throughput – Why GPUs Started to Shine

As chip designers began to see the limits of simply adding more powerful CPU cores, they started thinking beyond just making a handful of cores faster or bigger. Instead, they looked at the kinds of problems that could be solved by doing many things at the same time—what we call *parallel workloads*. Graphics processing was a prime example: rendering millions of pixels for video games or visual effects couldn’t be handled efficiently by a small number of powerful cores working in sequence.

This need for massive parallelism led to the rise of GPUs, which are built specifically to handle thousands of tasks in parallel. At first, GPUs were designed for graphics, but their unique architecture—optimized for high throughput over low latency—quickly found use in other fields. Researchers realized the same strengths that made GPUs perfect for graphics could also accelerate scientific simulations, AI model training, and machine learning. As CPUs hit power and heat bottlenecks, GPUs emerged as the solution for workloads that demand processing lots of data all at once.

GPGPU Programming – Opening New Worlds of Computing

Once GPUs proved their value for graphics and other massively parallel tasks, chip designers and researchers started thinking—why not use this horsepower for more than just pictures? That’s when new tools and frameworks like CUDA (from Nvidia), OpenCL, and HIP (from AMD) came on the scene. These platforms let developers write code that runs directly on GPUs, not just for graphics, but for general-purpose computing—think physics simulations, scientific research, or training AI models.

What’s really cool is that modern machine learning and data science libraries, like PyTorch and TensorFlow, now plug into these GPU platforms automatically. You don’t need to be a graphics expert to unlock GPU performance. Just use these mainstream libraries, and your neural networks or data processing jobs can run way faster by tapping into the power of parallel computing.

Making the Most of Modern Tools

With the rise of AI-powered code editors and smart development tools, a lot of the basic boilerplate code you used to struggle with is now at your fingertips. These tools can auto-generate functions, fill in templates, and catch errors before you even hit “run.” For many tasks, even beginners can write working code quickly—whether it’s basic CUDA or HIP kernels or simple deep learning pipelines.

But as this kind of automation becomes standard, the real value in software engineering is shifting. The next wave of top developers will be the ones who don’t just rely on these tools for surface-level solutions. Instead, they’ll dig deeper—figuring out how everything works under the hood and how to squeeze out every ounce of performance. Understanding the full stack, from system architecture to fine-tuned GPU optimizations, is what separates those who simply use machine learning from those who make it run faster, smarter, and more efficiently.

Under the Hood

I’ll be diving even deeper into what’s really under the hood in GPU architecture in my upcoming articles—with plenty of hands-on CUDA and HIP examples you can use to get started or optimize your own projects. Stay tuned!

References:

  1. Moore’s Law - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moore's_law
  2. Dennard Scaling - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dennard_scaling
  3. GPGPU Intro - https://developer.nvidia.com/cuda-zone
  4. Cornell Virtual Workshop - https://cvw.cac.cornell.edu/gpu-architecture/gpu-characteristics/design

\ \ \

Clause de non-responsabilité : les articles republiés sur ce site proviennent de plateformes publiques et sont fournis à titre informatif uniquement. Ils ne reflètent pas nécessairement les opinions de MEXC. Tous les droits restent la propriété des auteurs d'origine. Si vous estimez qu'un contenu porte atteinte aux droits d'un tiers, veuillez contacter service@support.mexc.com pour demander sa suppression. MEXC ne garantit ni l'exactitude, ni l'exhaustivité, ni l'actualité des contenus, et décline toute responsabilité quant aux actions entreprises sur la base des informations fournies. Ces contenus ne constituent pas des conseils financiers, juridiques ou professionnels, et ne doivent pas être interprétés comme une recommandation ou une approbation de la part de MEXC.

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi

Ripple CEO: “SWIFT Created a Monster by Pushing Us Out” – XRP Army Reacts

Ripple CEO: “SWIFT Created a Monster by Pushing Us Out” – XRP Army Reacts

Ripple CEO says SWIFT’s rejection fueled company’s unstoppable global rise. XRP Army celebrates Garlinghouse’s bold remarks on Ripple’s transformation journey. From exclusion to dominance, Ripple reshapes finance with blockchain innovation. Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse has reignited discussions across the crypto community after revisiting the company’s early struggles with SWIFT. His remarks, made during a recent speech shared by Black Swan Capitalist (@VersanAljarrah) on X, sparked a wave of reactions from the XRP Army, who view Ripple’s journey as proof of long-term resilience and growing dominance in global finance. According to Garlinghouse, Ripple was once denied space at the prestigious Sibos conference in Toronto, an event hosted by SWIFT that brings together the world’s largest banks and financial institutions. Instead of stepping back, Ripple organized its own event nearby, transforming a warehouse into a stage that featured notable figures, including former U.S. Federal Reserve Chair Ben Bernanke. Garlinghouse revealed that SWIFT’s refusal became the very spark that pushed Ripple to establish its independent identity. “We couldn’t get a booth at Sibos, so we created our own event down the street,” he said, adding, “SWIFT created more of a monster by pushing us out.” His statement quickly drew attention from XRP supporters who praised Ripple’s determination and evolution from a dismissed startup into a global player. Also Read: Franklin Templeton Launches Hong Kong’s First Tokenized Money-Market Fund Under New Fintech Strategy Incredible speech @BGarlinghouse It’s true, @Ripple has cornered the market with the full backing of regulators, financial institutions, and private banks. Ripple is on its way to becoming a bank of its own, with $XRP at its core, one that will eventually replace central banks. pic.twitter.com/8RM4JOtz6O — Black Swan Capitalist (@VersanAljarrah) November 6, 2025 Ripple’s Rise and the XRP Community’s Response Over the years, Ripple’s influence within the financial sector has expanded significantly. Once seen as an outsider, the company now collaborates with prime brokers, ETF issuers, investment banks, and major financial institutions. Brad Garlinghouse emphasized that the same industry that once kept Ripple at arm’s length now works alongside it to advance digital finance and blockchain integration. Crypto and blockchain technologies, which were once considered “fringe,” have become central to modern financial systems. Garlinghouse noted that they now form part of society’s financial infrastructure, supporting greater inclusion and cross-border efficiency. In the X post, Black Swan Capitalist described Ripple as having “cornered the market with the full backing of regulators, financial institutions, and private banks.” The post also suggested that Ripple is on its path to becoming a bank of its own, with XRP at its core—fueling speculation among supporters that it could eventually rival traditional central banks. Garlinghouse’s remarks not only revisited Ripple’s early challenges but also symbolized its transformation into a driving force in global finance. The XRP community celebrated his comments as a testament to how rejection can turn into momentum, and how innovation, once sidelined, can reshape the future of the financial world. Also Read: VeChain (VET) Flashes Rare Buy Signals as Analysts Predict Major Price Reversal The post Ripple CEO: “SWIFT Created a Monster by Pushing Us Out” – XRP Army Reacts appeared first on 36Crypto.
Partager
Coinstats2025/11/06 20:59