You Don’t Own Your Digital Life. Yet

2025/09/03 22:37

A guide for Web3 newcomers: understanding the transition from rented to owned digital identities

Most people take their online presence for granted assuming their digital life belongs to them. It doesn’t. The harsh truth is that the internet is becoming less free, and your online existence is becoming more dependent, fragmented and fragile.

This article will explain why and what you can do about it.

Currently, your digital identity — everything from your email address and social media accounts to your business website — relies on an infrastructure that governments and corporations fully control and can manipulate according to their agenda. Your username, your followers, your reputation, even your ability to prove who you are online — all of it depends on companies that profit from keeping you dependent on their systems.

Moreover, European Union’s NIS2 directive that went into effect last year gave governments unprecedented power to control domain name systems. Most people don’t notice these changes and where this is heading because everything happens gradually.

The Identity Problem You Didn’t Know You Had

Consider how you currently exist online and how you prove your digital identity. Like most of us, you probably have several different usernames and accounts across multiple platforms. Maybe your professional identity lives on LinkedIn, then you have your creative work on Instagram, and your thoughts on X, your financial accounts with different banks, your shopping profiles, entertainment subscriptions, cloud storage and so on. Each requires different passwords, follows different rules, and gives you a fragment of what should be a unified digital self. A maze (or mayhem) that eats up your time and energy and sometimes can cost you your personal brand or business.

The deeper issue is that none of these identities actually belong to you. They’re usernames assigned by companies that can revoke them based on terms of service that can change without notice. You can spend years building your audience, reputations and business relationships around identities you don’t control. And then, when platforms decide you’re no longer valuable or compliant, years of that work can be gone in a moment. We like to think it won’t happen to us, but it can. And so far, we’ve gone along with it.

When the User Became Also the Product

The internet (or web2) we use today is far off from its original vision. Instead of the imagined network of equals sharing information freely, we got centralized platforms that collect your personal data for profit.

Your every click, search, upload and interaction gets recorded and analyzed. Your browsing habits, purchasing decisions, and social connections become data points in corporate databases used to predict and influence your future online behavior. The platforms you use daily, use you daily — they extract value from every moment you spend online.

And it can go deeper and sometimes darker than this. Political campaigns can buy access to your psychological profile to deliver messages that bypass your rational thinking. Retailers adjust prices based on your browsing history and income predictions and insurance companies experiment with denying coverage based on social media analysis.

Web3: Democracy Online

You’ve probably heard about Web3 in connection with cryptocurrency or NFTs. And that’s where a lot of quick, and often wrong, conclusions came from. While those are applications built on Web3 technology, they’re not what Web3 is really about. In Web3 we go from platforms that extract value to networks that serve users.

The big difference is who’s in control. Today, a few big companies run the internet — when you use any major platform, you’re using their servers, following their rules, and they get to keep all the value you create. They can change those rules anytime they want. They can lock you out. They can take your content down. You have no real say in any of it.

Web3 works through something called decentralization. Instead of everything running on servers owned by one company, it runs on networks that thousands of people help maintain. No single company gets to make all the decisions. The people using the network actually have a voice in how it operates.

For Web3 newcomers, ownership changes everything. When you own your digital identity, no platform can take it away. When you control your data, you decide who gets access and how it’s used. When you own your online presence, it survives platform changes and policy updates.

STR.Domains: A New Model of Digital Identity

So how we turn those principles into reality and reclaim what we lost with Web2: our autonomy and digital identity? SourceLess does that through advanced blockchain technology and its STR Domains.

Unlike traditional domain names that you rent annually, with STR.Domains, you own your digital identity for life, in a way that is secure and fully controlled by you. The domain itself is verifiable, portable, and tradable like a real asset. It functions as multi-layered identity hub that unifies everything you do online:

Login and authentication: a decentralized sign-in, replacing platform-dependent usernames and passwords across any service that supports Web3 identity standards.

Business presence: a verifiable storefront or professional profile that travels with you across platforms.

This makes STR.Domains a self-contained digital passport: ID, wallet, communication, and presence unified under one domain that you control completely.

Built for Real-World Use

What sets STR.Domains apart from other digital identity solutions is practical integration with a complete Web3 working ecosystem.

STR.Domains gives you instant access to tools you can use daily:

STR.Talk — private, encrypted communication tied directly to your domain. No corporate intermediary can scan your messages or block your communications.

Ccoin Finance — financial independence through your own domain. You can send and receive payments, manage assets, and conduct transactions without depending on traditional banking systems that can freeze accounts or impose restrictions based on changing policies.

ARES AI — intelligent management of your digital presence, a personal assistant helping you navigate and optimize your interactions across Web3 and traditional internet services.

Privacy and Security in Practice

STR.Domains are built on SourceLess’ hybrid blockchain architecture that combines distributed ledger technology with peer-to-peer mesh networking. This eliminates single points of failure that can be targeted by attackers or authorities.

All communication tied to your domain uses end-to-end encryption that only you control. No corporation can scan your messages for advertising data. No government can demand backdoor access to your private communications.

Most importantly, STR.Domains resist DNS-level censorship. No central registrar can seize or take down your domain because the ownership lives on blockchain infrastructure that no single entity controls.

Choosing Digital Independence

The internet we’ve been living in trained us to accept dependency as normal. To accept that a company can decide if we exist online, that our identities should be fragmented, that control belongs anywhere but with us.

It doesn’t have to stay that way.

Web3 solutions can be daunting for beginners. That’s why STR.Domains work as human-readable, user-friendly names that provide permanent digital identity without requiring technical expertise.

This accessibility makes STR.Domains an ideal entry point for people transitioning from Web2 to Web3. You get familiar naming conventions but with actual ownership. This way you can start using Web3 tools at your own pace while maintaining compatibility with traditional internet services.

For Web3 newcomers, having an STR.Domain means also you don’t have to choose between convenience and ownership. You get both — a simple, permanent identity that works everywhere and gives you control over your entire digital life.

Learn more about digital ownership at SourceLess and claim your digital identity at str.domains.


You Don’t Own Your Digital Life. Yet was originally published in Coinmonks on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story.

Clause de non-responsabilité : les articles republiés sur ce site proviennent de plateformes publiques et sont fournis à titre informatif uniquement. Ils ne reflètent pas nécessairement les opinions de MEXC. Tous les droits restent la propriété des auteurs d'origine. Si vous estimez qu'un contenu porte atteinte aux droits d'un tiers, veuillez contacter service@support.mexc.com pour demander sa suppression. MEXC ne garantit ni l'exactitude, ni l'exhaustivité, ni l'actualité des contenus, et décline toute responsabilité quant aux actions entreprises sur la base des informations fournies. Ces contenus ne constituent pas des conseils financiers, juridiques ou professionnels, et ne doivent pas être interprétés comme une recommandation ou une approbation de la part de MEXC.
Partager des idées

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi

After 16 billion data breaches: The ultimate security self-check manual that every encryption user should keep

After 16 billion data breaches: The ultimate security self-check manual that every encryption user should keep

Recently, a data leak that is said to be the "largest in history" has been confirmed by multiple cybersecurity researchers. A huge database containing up to 16 billion login credentials
Partager
PANews2025/06/20 19:00
Partager
Bitcoin vs. Berkshire Hathaway: A Tale of Two Titans

Bitcoin vs. Berkshire Hathaway: A Tale of Two Titans

Bitcoin vs Berkshire Hathaway One could argue that Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A) is the Bitcoin of traditional investing. With the stock price closing at $755,280 as of the writing of this article, credit is certainly due to Mr. Buffett and the late Charlie Munger for their Einsteinian understanding of business and finance. Buffett acquires straightforward and simple businesses like Jordan’s Furniture, which was founded in 1918. He recently purchased Bell Laboratories, a private rodent control company. Many of these companies are not well known. Berkshire Hathaway acquires companies based on fundamentals, not popularity. Although Buffett owns shares of recognizable brands like Apple (AAPL), the list of companies owned by Berkshire Hathaway is vanilla. Bitcoin is not vanilla. Bitcoin does not sell furniture or candy, nor does it make rat poison. It is an exotic financial digital asset that does not depend on a board of directors to decide if the Bitcoin halving will occur. The halving simply happens, driven by code. How fitting — Buffett once described Bitcoin as rat poison, yet he ended up buying a company that makes rat poison. Crypto is too exotic for Buffett.Buffet on Bitcoin How is Bitcoin and Berkshire Hathaway Alike? The most obvious similarity between them is their price. Both assets are high-priced. There is anticipation and excitement about when Bitcoin’s (BTC) price will reach one million, but Berkshire Hathaway’s Class A shares (BRK.A) are about $300,000 away from that milestone. Although both assets are currently high-priced, they were inexpensive in their early days. Fool.com: Bitcoin did not exist in 1964, but in 2009, it was priced at less than a penny. Bitcoinmagazine.com: Let’s have a little fun based on this transaction. The following prices are based on the previous day’s close as of September 1, 2025. Let’s compare 5,050 (BTC) against 5,050 (BRK.A). Asset Performance Comparison: BRK-A vs BTC Both assets performed beautifully, and the results are impressive. Bitcoin wins in terms of percentage gains, but Berkshire Hathaway takes the lead in dollar gains. Either way, investors would be pleased with both returns. For perspective, at a price of $11.375, just $22.75 (two shares) invested in Berkshire Hathaway would now be worth $1.5 million based on the current price shown in the table above. For the past five years, both titans have convincingly outperformed the S&P 500. Let’s look at Berkshire Hathaway first.StockCharts.com: BRK.A vs S&P500 Let’s take a look at Bitcoin vs. the S&P 500.StockCharts.com: BTC vs. S&P500 Now, let’s see how BTC has performed against BRK.A over the past five years.StockCharts.com: BRK.A vs. BTC In terms of percentage gains, Bitcoin has outperformed Berkshire Hathaway and the S&P 500. The unicorn feat of those dollar-value and percentage price gains is driven by another commonality between the assets: scarcity. Both assets have a limited supply; most of Bitcoin’s supply has already been mined. Cointelegraph.com: As of the most recent data, Berkshire Hathaway has approximately 1.44 million Class A shares outstanding, with earnings per share of $43,760.15 over the past 12 months. Absolutely mind-blowing! With a forward P/E ratio of 23, that implies a stock price estimate of over a million dollars. With such scarce supply and strong demand from investors, the prices of Berkshire Hathaway and Bitcoin behave according to the basic economics of supply and demand. When there is strong demand for a rare asset, its price will likely appreciate. Although Bitcoin has its share of doubters, both assets are highly regarded by investors. Bitcoin currently has a market cap of $2.19 trillion, while Berkshire Hathaway’s market cap stands at $1.09 trillion. A significant amount of money has been invested in both. Berkshire Hathaway's institutional ownership is 54.15%. As of August 2025, institutional investors collectively hold approximately 30.9% of Bitcoin’s circulating supply, equating to about 6.1 million BTC. This includes holdings by public companies, exchange-traded funds (ETFs), and government entities. Notably, MicroStrategy (now known as Strategy) remains the largest corporate holder, owning around 597,000 BTC. And finally, let’s have some more fun and see who is richer: Satoshi Nakamoto or Warren Buffett?As of 9/4/2025 The Oracle of Omaha wins for now, but as Bitcoin's supply continues to diminish through the halving, and with sustained demand, the value of Nakamoto’s holdings will likely appreciate. Learn more about Sunlight Jade: Social Media, White Paper. Bitcoin vs. Berkshire Hathaway: A Tale of Two Titans was originally published in Coinmonks on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story
Partager
Medium2025/09/05 12:53
Partager