One way to guarantee they won’t know the answers to these questions is if you make them up and save them in your password manager for future reference.One way to guarantee they won’t know the answers to these questions is if you make them up and save them in your password manager for future reference.

You Should Be Faking Your Security Answers

2025/09/28 22:00

The Gentle January series shares one practical privacy tip a day from a Markup staffer who actually uses the advice in their own life.

\ What’s your mother’s maiden name? What was the name of your first childhood pet? Occasionally you’ll have to answer questions like this to create a login with certain companies—in my experience it’s usually financial institutions and health care conglomerates.

\ The idea is that someone trying to break into your account by resetting your password wouldn’t know the answers to these personal questions.

\ That may be true—or not, if that hypothetical hacker can learn the answers from other sources. But one way to guarantee they won’t know the answers to these questions is if you make them up and save them in your password manager for future reference. As a bonus, you won’t be sharing details about your life that could end up getting exposed along with those of 35.8 million other people.

\ I recommend searching Duck Duck Go for “passphrase” or visiting useapassphrase.com to get easy-to-say but hard-to-guess candidates.

\ Then, confident in the knowledge that you’ve closed one potential avenue for leaking personal information, relax, call your mom (or Ms. Important Gem Pasta as your bank would call her), and ask her to give good ol’ Paradox Dropkick Neurotic a scratch behind the ears for you.

Have your own practical privacy tip?

Email it to tips@themarkup.org, along with how you’d like to be identified. We will highlight some reader tips near the end of Gentle January.


Credits

  • Tomas Apodaca, Journalism Engineer

Design and Graphics

  • Gabriel Hongsdusit

Engagement

  • Maria Puertas

Editing

  • Ryan Tate
  • Michael Reilly

\ Also published here

\ Photo by Laurin Steffens on Unsplash

\

Clause de non-responsabilité : les articles republiés sur ce site proviennent de plateformes publiques et sont fournis à titre informatif uniquement. Ils ne reflètent pas nécessairement les opinions de MEXC. Tous les droits restent la propriété des auteurs d'origine. Si vous estimez qu'un contenu porte atteinte aux droits d'un tiers, veuillez contacter service@support.mexc.com pour demander sa suppression. MEXC ne garantit ni l'exactitude, ni l'exhaustivité, ni l'actualité des contenus, et décline toute responsabilité quant aux actions entreprises sur la base des informations fournies. Ces contenus ne constituent pas des conseils financiers, juridiques ou professionnels, et ne doivent pas être interprétés comme une recommandation ou une approbation de la part de MEXC.
Partager des idées

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi

Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO

Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO

The post Aave DAO to Shut Down 50% of L2s While Doubling Down on GHO appeared on BitcoinEthereumNews.com. Aave DAO is gearing up for a significant overhaul by shutting down over 50% of underperforming L2 instances. It is also restructuring its governance framework and deploying over $100 million to boost GHO. This could be a pivotal moment that propels Aave back to the forefront of on-chain lending or sparks unprecedented controversy within the DeFi community. Sponsored Sponsored ACI Proposes Shutting Down 50% of L2s The “State of the Union” report by the Aave Chan Initiative (ACI) paints a candid picture. After a turbulent period in the DeFi market and internal challenges, Aave (AAVE) now leads in key metrics: TVL, revenue, market share, and borrowing volume. Aave’s annual revenue of $130 million surpasses the combined cash reserves of its competitors. Tokenomics improvements and the AAVE token buyback program have also contributed to the ecosystem’s growth. Aave global metrics. Source: Aave However, the ACI’s report also highlights several pain points. First, regarding the Layer-2 (L2) strategy. While Aave’s L2 strategy was once a key driver of success, it is no longer fit for purpose. Over half of Aave’s instances on L2s and alt-L1s are not economically viable. Based on year-to-date data, over 86.6% of Aave’s revenue comes from the mainnet, indicating that everything else is a side quest. On this basis, ACI proposes closing underperforming networks. The DAO should invest in key networks with significant differentiators. Second, ACI is pushing for a complete overhaul of the “friendly fork” framework, as most have been unimpressive regarding TVL and revenue. In some cases, attackers have exploited them to Aave’s detriment, as seen with Spark. Sponsored Sponsored “The friendly fork model had a good intention but bad execution where the DAO was too friendly towards these forks, allowing the DAO only little upside,” the report states. Third, the instance model, once a smart…
Partager
BitcoinEthereumNews2025/09/18 02:28
Partager